Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate of Applied Linguistics, Department of English, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan Branch, Zanjan, Iran.

2 M.A. in TEFL, Department of English, Islamic Azad University, Maragheh Branch, Maragheh, Iran.

Abstract

The short-term in-service EFL teacher education programs are assumed to be of crucial importance in upgrading teachers' methodologies and gearing their teaching more closely to the students' needs. Therefore, a dynamic in-service program for EFL teachers is needed to keep abreast of the time.The present study aims to investigate the role of experience in EFL teachers' satisfaction of the in-service teacher education programs in Zanjan city. 200 EFL teachers from Zanjan province (1 &2 districts) were participated in this study.The data collected through the Course-evaluation questionnaire with “five-level Likert scale”. The results were analyzed through both descriptive and inferential statistics.The findings showed that There is a significant difference between teachers’ experience and their satisfaction of in-service programs.Thus novice teachers and experienced teachers have different expectation of the in-service teacher education programs.This production of significant difference about the relationship between the EFL teachers' experience and their satisfaction of the in-service teacher education programs can be contributed to different perceptions of the teachers on the relationship between the EFL teachers' experience and their satisfaction of the in-service teacher education programs

Keywords

Main Subjects

Article Title [Persian]

نقش تجارب معلمان زبان انگلیسی در میزان رضایتمندی آنان از دوره های آموزش ضمن خدمت

Abstract [Persian]

برنامه های آموزش ضمن خدمت معلمان زبان انگلیسی در تقویت روش ­های تدریس و هدایت تدریس آنها به سمت برآوره سازی هر چه بیشتر  نیازهای دانش آموزان اهمیت بسزایی دارد. بنابراین، با گذشت زمان نیاز به یک برنامه پویای آموزش ضمن خدمت احساس می­شود. مقاله حاضر می­کوشد نقش سابقه و تجربه معلمان زبان انگلیسی را در رضایتمندی آنان از دوره ­های آموزش ضمن خدمت شهر زنجان بررسی نماید.تعداد 200 معلم زبان از نواحی 1 و 2 شهر زنجان در این تحقیق مشارکت داشتند. داده­ها از طریق پرسشنامه ارزیابی دوره که از طریق مقیاس 5 سطحی لیکرت بود، جمع آوری گردید.نتایج از طریق آمارهای توصیفی و استنباطی مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند.یافته ها حاکی از آن بود که تفاوت معناداری بین تجارب معلمان و میزان رضایتمندی آنان از دوره­های ضمن خدمت وجود دارد.بنابراین معلمان تازه کار  و با سابقه انتظارات متفاوتی از دوره های ضمن خدمت معلمان دارند.

Keywords [Persian]

  • آموزش ضمن خدمت
  • آموزش پیش از خدمت
  • آموزش معلم
  • تربیت معلم
  • و تجربه
Abbasi, M. H., &Millar, A. C. (1996).The role of educational technology in upgrading teacher education in Pakistan.In J. G. Hedberg, J. Steele &S. McNamara (Eds.),Learning Technologies: Prospects and Pathways (PP. 1-6).Selected papersfromEdTech'96.Canberra: AJET Publications. http://www.aset.org.au/confs/edtech96/abbasi.html
Ahrens, M. R. (1957). In-ServiceTeacher Training in the United States of America,Education Abstracts. IX(10), 3-4.
Akbari, R., &Moradkhani, S. (2010). Iranian English teachers’ selfefficacy: Do academic degree and experience make a difference? Pazhuhesh-e Zabanha-ye Khareji, 56, 25–47.Retrieved May 2010 www.Magiran.com.
Allen, S. J. (2007).Adult learning theory and leadership development.Kravis Leadership Institute,Claremont McKenna College, 7, 26-37.
Arends, R.  (1989).Learning to Teach.New York: McGraw Hill.
Bose, M.N.K. (1997). Language Teacher Education, Problems and Practices. Madras, India: New Century Book House.
Calderhead, J., &Shorrock, S. (1997). Understanding teacher education: Case studies in the professional development of beginning teachers. London: Falmer.
Carpenter, T.P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Change, C., &Loef, M. (1989).Using Knowledge of Children’s Mathematics Thinking in Classroom Teaching: An Experimental Study.American Educational Research Journal, 26, 499-531.
Cochran-Smith, M.,& Lytle, S. L. (2001). Beyond uncertainty: taking an inquiry stance on practice. In A. Lieberman, &L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers Caught in the Action: Professional Development that Matters. New York: Teachers College Press.
Coladarci, T., & Gage, N.L. (1984).Effects of a Minimal Intervention on Teacher Behavior and Student Achievement.American Educational Research Journal, 21, 539-555.
Coşkuner, M. (2001).Turkish provincial state university teachers’ perceptions of English language teaching as a career.Unpublished master’s thesis, Bilkent University, Ankara.
Craft, A. (2000).Continuing professional development: A practical guide for teachers. Florence, KY, USA: Routledge.
Day, Ch. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. Florence, KY, USA: Taylor.
Dubin, F., & Wong, R. (1990). An ethnographic approach to in-service preparation: The Hungary file. In J. C. Richards,& D. Nunan (Eds.), Second language teacher edu1cation (pp.282-292). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edelfelt, R. A., & Lawrence, G. (1975). In-Service Education: The State of the Art. In R. A. Edelfelt, &M. Johnson (Eds.), Rethinking In-Service Education (P. 5). Washington, DC:  National Education As­sociation.
England, L. (1998). Promoting effective professional development in English language teaching. Forum, 36, 18-26. http://exchanges.state.gov/forum
Ferguson, G., &Donnon, S. (2001). One-Month Teacher Training Courses: Time for a change. ELT Journal, 57(1), 26-33.
Freeman, D. (1982). Observing teachers: Three approaches to in-service training development.TESOL Quarterly, 16, 21–28.
Freeman, D. (1989). Teacher training, development, and decision making: A model of teaching and related strategies for language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 27-45.                        
Freeman, D. (2001). Second language teacher education. In R. Carter & D. Nunan, (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages(PP. 72-79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, D. (2002). Second language teacher education. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 72–79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fullan, M. &Steigelbauer, S. (l991).The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). NewYork: Teachers College Press.
Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. (1993). Pre-service biology teachers’ knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: A year-long assessment. Science Education, 77(1), 25–45.  
Griffin, G., & Barnes, S. (1986). Using Research Findings to Change School and Classroom Practices: Results of an Experimental Study.American Educational Research Journal, 23, 572-586.
HabibiTodeh,A. (2000).The EFL teachers' perceptions of efficiency of short term in-service programs on their occupational competences.M.A thesis.
Hammadou, J. (2004). Identifying the best foreign language teachers.Teacher Standards and Professional Portfolio, 88(3), 390-402.
Hass, G. (1957). In-Service Education Today. In N. B. Henry (Ed.), The Fifty-sixth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp.13-30). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.                   
Hayes, D. (1995). In-service teacher development: some basic principles. ELT Journal, 49(3), 252-261.
Hayes, D. (1997). In-service teacher development: International perspectives. London: Prentice Hall.                         
Henderson, E. S. (1978). The Evaluation of In-Service Teacher Training. London: Billing and Sons Limited.
Isikoglu, N., Basturk, R., &Karaca, F. (2009).Assessing in-service teachers’ instructional beliefs about student-centered education: A Turkish perspective.Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2), 350–356.
Koç, S. (1992). Teachers-on-line: An alternative model for in-service teacher training in ELT.In The British Council (Ed.), Tradition and innovation - ELT and teacher training in the 1990s (pp. 47-53). Ankara: British Council.
Lee, I. (2007). Preparing pre-service English teachers for reflective practice. ELT Journal, 61(4),321- 329.
Lippitt, K., & Fox, R. (1971). Development and Maintenance of Effective Classroom Learning in Improving In-Service Education: Proposals and Procedures for Change. In L. J.  Rubin (Ed.), (p. 149). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Lopriore, L. (1998). A systemic teacher education intervention: The Italian in-ervice education program for foreign language teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 510-516.
Morant, R.W. (1981). In-Service Education within the School.London: George Allen &Unwin.
Murdoch, G. (1994). Language development provision in teacher training curricula.ELT Journal, 48(3), 253-259.
Palmer, C. (1993). Innovation and experienced teacher.ELT Journal, 47, 166-171.
Puglaar, B. (1957). Identifying Teacher Needs for Programs of Professional Education.Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, George Peabody College. 
Rahimi, M., &Nabilou, Z. (2010).Iranian EFL teachers’ effectiveness of instructional behavior in public and private high school.Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(2010), 67-78.
SafaeiAsl,E., &SafaeiAsl,N. (2014). A Case Study on Needs Assessment of English Language Teachers’ In-Service Training Courses.Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 2(2), 99-106.
Stephens, T. M, &Hartman, C. A. (1978).  In-Service Education: Its Murky Past and Uncertain Future. Journal of the School of Education.
Sugrue, C. (2001). Developing teachers and teaching practice. Florence, KY, USA: Routledge.
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.