Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 MA in TEFL, English Translation and Teaching Department, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

2 Associate Professor in English Translation, English Translation and Teaching Department, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

This study aimed to discover the effect of mobile-assisted teaching of collocations on Iranian EFL learners’ reading achievement. For this purpose, a PET test was given to 85 intermediate EFL learners as the proficiency test. After homogenization, 30 female and male students within the age range of 16 to 30 years old from an institute in Alborz Province were selected as the participants in the experimental group and 30 female and male students within the age range of 14 to 25 years old from another institute in Alborz province were selected as the participants in the control group, as well. A reading test was utilized as the pre-test to measure the participants’ reading achievement. The participants in the experimental group received mobile-assisted teaching of collocations through Flax Completing Collocation game while the participants in the control group received teacher instruction of the collocations existing in the game inside the classroom. To discover the effect of mobile-assisted teaching of collocations, a post-test, the same as the pre-test was given to the participants after the treatment. An independent t-test was run to compare the experimental and control groups’ means on the pre and posttest of reading achievement. The results indicated that the experimental group, after receiving mobile-assisted teaching of collocations, significantly outperformed the control group on the posttest of reading achievement. Regarding the findings of the study, the achieved results would help EFL teachers, learners, and material developers to be informed about the effect of mobile-assisted teaching of collocations on reading ability. Furthermore, this study presents some recommendations in future studies.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Article Title [Persian]

تاثیر مساعدت تلفن همراه در تدریس کلمات هم آیند بر توانایی خواندن زبان آموزان انگلیسی

Authors [Persian]

  • مهرناز جمشیدی 1
  • دکتر زهره محمدی زنوزق 2

1 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرج

2 گروه مترجمی و آموزش زبان انگلیسی - دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرج

Abstract [Persian]

هدف از این تحقیق، پی بردن به تاثیر مساعدت تلفن همراه در تدریس کلمات هم آیند بر توانایی خواندن زبان آموزان انگلیسی ایرانی می باشد. برای این منظور، یک آزمون به عنوان آزمون مهارت به زبان آموز سطح متوسط داده شد. بعد از یکسان سازی، دانش آموز مونث و مذکر در محدوده سنی 14 تا 25 سال از یک آموزشگاه واقع در کرج به عنوان شرکت کنندگان در گروه آموزشی و دانش آموزان مونث و مذکر در محدوده سنی 16 تا 30 سال از آموزشگاه دیگری در کرج به عنوان شرکت کنندگان گروه کنترل انتخاب شدند. یک آزمون خواندن به عنوان پیش آزمون مورد استفاده قرار گرفت تا توانایی خواندن شرکت کنندگان را اندازه گیری کند. شرکت کنندگان در گروه آزمایشی، تدریس کلمات هم آیند با مساعدت تلفن همراه از طریق بازی را دریافت کردند در حالی که شرکت کنندگان در گروه کنترل تدریس کلمات هم آیند موجود در بازی را از طریق معلم و داخل کلاس دریافت کردند. برای پی بردن به تاثیر مساعدت تلفن همراه در تدریس کلمات هم آیند، یک پس آزمون، مشابه پیش آزمون به شرکت کنندگان داده شد. یک مستقل برای مقایسه میانگین گروههای کنترل و آزمایشی بر پیش آزمون و پس آزمون توانایی خواندن انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که گروه آزمایشی پس از دریافت تدریس کلمات هم آیند با مساعدت تلفن همراه به طور قابل توجهی عملکرد بهتری نسبت به گروه کنترل در پس آزمون توانایی خواندن داشتند. با توجه به یافته های این مطالعه، نتایج به دست آمده به معلمان، زبان آموزان، و تدوین کنندگان مطالب درسی کمک خواهد کرد تا آگاهی بیشتری در مورد تاثیر مساعدت تلفن همراه در تدریس کلمات هم آیند بر توانایی خواندن به دست آورند. به علاوه این مطالعه چندین پیشنهاد برای مطالعات آینده ارائه میدهد.

Keywords [Persian]

  • فراگیری زبان انگلیسی به کمک تلفن همراه
  • کلمات هم آیند
  • توانایی خواندن
  • درک مطلب
  • زبان دوم
Ahmadi, D., & Reza, M. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review.International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2), 115-125.
Altuwairesh, N. S. (2017). Teaching Collocations in EFL Classroom.
Ashouri, S., &MashhadiHeidar, D. (2015).The impact of teaching corpus-based collocation on EFL learners'writing ability.International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 3(10), 53-62.
Attar, E. M., & Allami, H. (2013).The effect of teaching lexical collocations on speaking ability of Iranian EFL learners.Theory and practice in language studies, 3(6), 1070-1079.
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984).Metacognitive skills and reading.Handbook of  reading research, 1(353), V394.
Barnes, M. A. (2015). What Do Models of Reading Comprehension and Its Development Have to Contribute to a Science of Comprehension Instruction and Assessment for Adolescents? In Improving reading comprehension of middle and high school students (pp. 1-18). Springer, Cham.
Bezircilioğlu, S. (2016). Mobile assisted language learning. Journal of Educational and instructional studies in the world, 6.
Chinnery, G. M. (2006).Emerging technologies.Going to the mall: mobile assisted language learning.Language learning & technology, 10(1), 9-16.
Dagdeler, K. O., Konca, M. Y., &Demiroz, H. (2020).The effect of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL)on EFL learners' collocation learning.Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(1), 489.
Gangaiamaran, R., &Pasupathi, M. (2017). Review on Use of Mobile Apps for Language Learning. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(21), 11242- 11251.
Gitsaki, C. (1999). Second language lexical acquisition: A study of the development of collocational knowledge. Maryland: International Scholars Publications.
Gough, P. B., &Tunmer, W. E. (1986).Decoding, reading, and reading disability.Remedial and special education, 7(1), 6-10.
Hill, J. 2000. Revising priorities: From grammatical failure to collocational success. In Teaching Collocation, ed. Michael Lewis, 47–70. Hove, England: Language Teaching Publications.
Howarth, P. (1998). Phraseology and second language proficiency.Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 22- 44.
Hsu, J-Y.(2010).The Effects of Collocation Instruction on the Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary Learning of Taiwanese College English Majors.Asian EFL Journal, 12, (1), 47-87.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction integration model. Psychological review, 95(2), 163.
Kruidenier, J. (2002). Based Principles for Adult Basic Education Reading Instruction.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2005) Introduction. In A. Kukulska-Hulme& J. Traxler (Eds.) Mobile Learning: A Handbook for Educators and Trainers, Routledge, London.
Lackman, K. (2011). Lexical Approach Activities.Ken Lackman& Associates Educational Consultants. Retrieved September, 2, 2013.
Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004).Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness.Language learning, 54(3), 399-436.
Lewis, M. (2000).Teaching Collocation: Further Developments in the Lexical Approach.Hove, England: Language Teaching Publications.
Mousavi, S. M., &Darani, L. H. (2018). Effect of collocations on Iranian EFL learners' writing: Attitude in focus. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(4), 131-145.
Nation, I. S. (2001).Learning vocabulary in another language. Ernst KlettSprachen.
Nattinger, J. R., &DeCarrico, J. S. (1992).Lexical phrases and language teaching.Oxford University Press.
NematTabrizi, A. R. (2016). Multiple intelligence and EFL learners' reading comprehension.Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 8(18), 199-221.
Nesselhauf, N. (2003). The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied linguistics, 24(2), 223-242.
Nothman, J., Ringland, N., Radford, W., Murphy, T., & Curran, J. R. (2013) Learning  multilingual named entity recognition from Wikipedia. Artificial Intelligence, 194, 151-175.
Polakova, P., &Klimova, B. (2019).Mobile Technology and Generation Z in the English Language Classroom-A Preliminary Study.Education Sciences 9(3), 2003.
Richards, C. J., & Schmidt, R. (2010).Longman dictionary of language teaching and appliedlinguistics. Britain: Pearson
Shepherd, M. (1980). Phonetic and structural analysis of words: The Oakland Way.
Strucker, J., & Davidson, R. (2003). Adult Reading Components Study (ARCS). A NCSALL Research Brief.National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy (NCSALL).of computer assisted learning, 21(3), 217-228.
Tomlinson, B. (1998). Material development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wagner, R. K., Schatschneider, C., &Phythian-Sence, C. (Eds.). (2009). Beyond decoding: The behavioral foundations of reading comprehension. Guilford Press.
Yu, A., Wu, S., Witten, I. H., &König, J. (2016).Learning collocation with FLAX apps.In MLEARN 2016 (PP. 291-294).The University of Technology, Sydney.
Yukselir, C. (2017). A meta-synthesis of qualitative research about mobile assisted language learning (MALL) in foreign language teaching.Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 8.
Yurdagul, C., & Oz, S. (2018). Attitude towards mobile learning in English language education.Education Sciences, 8(3), 142.