Document Type : Research Article

Author

Assistant Professor of English Literature, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign languages, The University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

The field of Applied Literature is concerned with the practical usages of literature, including the potentials of literature to empower and transform individuals. Jungian criticism, with its suggestions of the possibility of individuation and self-actualization in individuals, has been an important source for scholars in the field of Applied Literature for healing. Still, the traditional Jungian approach to literature has been criticized in recent years, especially due to its apparent universalist assumptions and its insensitivity to context-specific issues in texts. For the same reason, New Jungian critics have been recently exploring the possibilities of reconciling Jungian concepts with more context-oriented literary theories. This paper, then, in accordance with this new trend, attempts to do a New Jungian reading of a contemporary postcolonial novel, Sweetness in the Belly, by Camilla Gibb , as a case study, to investigate the potentials within this approach of extension of Jungian ideas and dialogue with other more modern literary theories after poststructuralism. The research benefits from the views of New Jungian critics as well as the theories in relation to the identity issues of migrants. The paper is concluded with the proposition that, as the exploration of this novel testifies, the New Jungian approach as well as the contemporary fiction of identity construction can prove as valid resources for Applied Literature for healing.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Article Title [Persian]

ادبیات کاربردی و خوانش نو یونگی در رمان شیرینی در دل اثر کامیلا گیب

Abstract [Persian]

 ادبیات کاربردی در ارتباط با استفاده های عملی از ادبیات می باشد و یکی از جنبه های این استفاده، کاربرد ادبیات در روان درمانی و خودشکوفایی است.این گونه از ادبیات به طور ویژه از روانشناسی کارل گوستاو یونگ بهره می برد، چرا که در روانشناسی یونگ تاکید برامکان تک سازی افرادوجود دارد. با این حال روانشناسی یونگ، به علت جهت گیری جهانشمولانه وعدم حساسیت به متون وابسته به زمان و مکان خاص،در سالهای اخیر، مورد انتقاد منتقدین ادبی واقع شده است. گروه دیگری از منتقدان که به آنها لفظ "نویونگی" اطلاق می شود، با بسط و تفسیر مجدد آراء یونگ و بررسی امکان تعامل آن با نظریه های دیگر نقد، در صدد رفع این مشکل بر آمده اند. تحقیق حاضر، همسوبا نویونگیها به بررسی رمانی از کامیلا گیب با عنوان شیرینی در دل (2006)می پردازد تا ادعاهای نویونگیهابه بوته آزمایش گذاشته شود. در نتیجه و با بررسی این رمان، بر امکان بازخوانی نظریات یونگ در جهان معاصر و بر امکان تاثیر و تاثر نقد یونگی و دیگر مکاتب نقد ادبی صحه گذاشته می شود و تاکید می گردد که این بازنگری در روانشناسی یونگ، ادبیات کاربردی در حوزه خودشکوفایی را هم واجد منابع و ابزار وسیع و معتبر می گرداند.

Keywords [Persian]

  • ادبیات کاربردی
  • نقد یونگی
  • هویت
  • تک سازی
  • وشیرینی در دل
Abrams, M. H., &Harpham, G. G. (2009).A glossary of literary terms. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Anderson, S. M. (2014). Applied Literature for Healing, Transformation and Empowerment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3(6), 89-97.
Alcoff, L. M., &Mohanty, S. P. (2006).Reconsidering Identity Politics: An Introduction. In L. M. Alcoff, M. R. Hames-Garcia, S. P. Mohanty& P. M. Moya (Eds.), Identity politics reconsidered (pp. 1-9). New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
Bishop, P. (2002). Jung’s ‘Answer to Job’: A commentary. Hove: Brunner–Routledge.
Brooke, R. (1991). Jung and phenomenology. London: Routledge.
Brooke, R. (1999). Pathways into the Jungian world. London: Routledge.
Dawson, T. (2004).The effective protagonist in the nineteenth-century British novel: Scott, Bronte¨, Eliot, Wilde. Aldershot, UK and Burlington: Ashgate.
Dillon, M. (1999).Catholic identity: balancing reason, faith and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gallant, C. (1978). Blake and the assimilation of chaos. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gallant, C. (1996). Tabooed Jung: Marginality as power. London: Macmillan, 1996.
Gibb, C. (2006). Sweetness in the belly. New York: Penguin Press.
Guerin, W. L., Labor, E., Morgan, L., Reesman, J. C., & Willingham, J. R. (2005).A handbook of critical approaches to literature. New York: Oxford University Press.
Harmon, W., & Holman, C. H. (2000).A handbook to literature. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Iser.W. (1978).The act of reading: a theory of aesthetic response. London and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Jung, C. G. (1953-91). The collected works of C. G. Jung (CW), vol. 1-20 (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). H. Read, M. Fordham and G. Adler (Eds.). London: Routledge; Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
McGregor, H. (2009).“Not Quite Ethiopian, But Not At All English”: Ethnography, hybridity, and diaspora in Camilla Gibb’s Sweetness in the Belly. ESC, 35(4), 95–115.
Moya, P. M. (2002). Learning from experience: minority identities, multicultural struggles. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ramazani, A. (2016). Health humanities and applied literature [Review of the book Health humanities, by P. Crawford, et al]. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 4(1), 125-31.
Rodríguez, N. (1996). The battle for the border: notes on autonomous migration, transnational communities, and the state. Social Justice, 23(3), 21-37.
Rowland, S. (2002).C.G. Jung and literary theory: The challenge from fiction. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. (Original work published 1999)
Rowland, S. (2005).Jung as a writer.London and New York: Routledge.
Santesso, E. (2013). Disorientation: Muslim identity in contemporary anglophone literature. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2009). Theories of personality. Belmont: Cenage learning
Tacey, D. (1988). Patrick White: fiction and the unconscious. Melbourne and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Tacey, D.(2006). How to read Jung. London: Granta.