Aktas, R. N., & Cortes, V. (2008). Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 3-14.
Botley, S. P. (2006). Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(1), 73-112.
Connor, U. (1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language students’ writing. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 17(3), 301-316.
Ebrahimi, S. F. (2014). “This Study Tests.....” Functional Analysis of the Grammatical Subjects in Research Article Abstracts: A Cross Disciplinary Study. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 3(4), 341-349.
Ebrahimi, S. F. (2017). “In order to…….” A functional study of marked theme in method sections from three disciplines. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 4(3), 689-699.
Flowerdew, J. (2003). Signaling nouns in discourse. English for specific purposes, 22(4), 329-346.
Francis, G. (1986). Anaphoric nouns (No. 11). English Language Research, Department of English, University of Birmingham.
Francis, G. (1989). Aspects of nominal-group lexical cohesion. Interface: Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4, 27-53.
Francis, G. (1994). Labelling discourse: an aspect of nominal-group lexical cohesion. In: M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp.83-101). New York: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman Group Limited.
Hinkel, E. (2001). Matters of cohesion in L2 academic texts. Applied language learning, 12(2), 111-132.
Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Routledge.
Hunston, S., & Francis, G. (1999). Pattern grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ivanič, R. (1991). Nouns in search of a context: A study of nouns with both open-and closed-system characteristics. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 29(2), 93-114.
Kashiha, H., & Chan, S. H. (2014). Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Investigation of Lexical Bundles in Academic Writing. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 22(4), 937-951.
Kolhatkar, V., & Hirst, G. (2014). Resolving shell nouns. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 499-510).
Liu, D. (2008). Linking adverbials: An across-register corpus study and its implications. International journal of corpus linguistics, 13(4), 491-518.
Liu, Q., & Deng, L. (2017). A genre-based study of shell-noun use in the N-be-that construction in popular and professional science articles. English for Specific Purposes, 48, 32-43.
Mousavi, A., & Moini, M. R. (2014). A corpus study of shell nouns in published research articles of education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1282-1289.
Nesi, H., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Lexical bundles and discourse signaling in academic lectures. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(3), 283-304.
Schmid, H. (2000). English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition. Walter de Gruyter.
Tadros, A. (1994). Predictive categories in expository text. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 69-82). New York: Routledge.
)