A Survey of EFL Teachers’ Research Engagement

Mehranirad, Mehdi; Behzadpoor, Foad

doi:10.22049/jalda.2022.27469.1365

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Mehdi Mehranirad ¹
Foad Behzadpoor ²

¹ Associate Professor of Applied Linguistics, English Department, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, University of Neyshabur, Neyshabur, Iran, http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6825-2042

² Assistant Professor of Applied Linguistics, English Department, Faculty of Literature & Humanities, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7565-7785

https://doi.org/10.22049/jalda.2022.27469.1365

Abstract

The field of language teaching has recently witnessed a resurgent wave of interest in the value of educational research and its impact on teachers’ practice. Consequently, various strands of inquiry have commenced to investigate the relationship between research and practice. Within these discussions, however, the opinions of teachers are mostly ignored or reflected only circumstantially. The purpose of this study was to take teachers’ views about research on board by exploring the extent to which they use and conduct research as well as the barriers that may hinder their research engagement. To collect data, a survey questionnaire was designed and validated through soliciting experts’ opinions and conducting factor analysis. The questionnaire was then administered among a large sample of Iranian English teachers. Participants’ responses showed moderate levels of research engagement among English teachers. Results also indicated that four categories of barriers can best account for teachers’ lack of research engagement: problems related to the nature and quality of research, restrictive educational policies, lack of systematic partnership, and problems associated with the use of research in educational settings. The findings suggest that the research-practice division is the result of a complex interaction of an array of factors that cannot be simply reduced to technical matters. Thus, reconfiguration of the gap requires multidimensional strands of development in research and practice communities as well as in educational policies.

Keywords

20.1001.1.28208986.2022.10.1.5.8

Main Subjects

Language teacher education

Article Title [Persian]

بررسی ارتباط معلمان زبان انگلیسی با پژوهش

Authors [Persian]

دکتر مهدی مهرانی راد ¹
دکتر فؤاد بهزادپور ²

¹ دانشیار زبانشناسی کاربردی، گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه نیشابور، نیشابور، ایران

² استادیار زبانشناسی کاربردی، گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان، تبریز، ایران

Abstract [Persian]

ارزش پژوهش و قابلیت تاثیرگذاری آن بر فعالیتهای آموزشی معلمان در سالهای اخیر مورد توجه بسیاری از پژوهشگران در رشته آموزش زبان بوده است. در این رابطه، تحقیقات مختلفی با هدف بهبود ارتباط بین پژوهش و عملکرد آموزشی صورت گرفته است. لیکن بررسیها نشان میدهد که در این پژوهشها دیدگاه معلمان به عنوان مهمترین کنشگران آموزشی چندان مورد توجه نبوده است. پژوهش پیش رو با هدف بررسی دیدگاه معلمان نسبت به بکارگیری یافتههای پژوهشی در آموزش زبان انجام شده است. بدین منظور، نخست پرسشنامهای برای تعیین میزان ارتباط معلمان با پژوهش و نیز بررسی موانع موجود در این راه تهیه شد. پس از مشخص شدن روایی و پایایی، به منظور گردآوری دادهها، پرسشنامه در بین بیش از پانصد معلم زبان انگلیسی توزیع شد. تحلیل پاسخهای معلمان نشان داد که ارتباط ایشان با پژوهشهای دانشگاهی به میزان متوسط هست، اما معلمانی که دارای مدارک دانشگاهی بالاتر و تجربه آموزشی کمتری هستند، تمایل بیشتری به انجام فعالیتهای پژوهشی دارند. علاوه براین یافتههای این پژوهش موید اینست که موانع بکارگیری پژوهش در آموزش زبان را میتوان به چهار گروه تقسیم کرد: موانع مرتبط با ماهیت و کیفیت پژوهشها، موانع مرتبط با سیاستهای آموزشی، موانع مربوط به عدم ارتباط سازنده بین محققان و معلمان، و موانع مرتبط با اجرایی شدن یافتههای پژوهشی در کلاسهای آموزش زبان. تحلیل آماری وزنی هر یک از موانع نیز نشان داد که عدم حمایتهای فکری و مالی، نبود سامانه جامع پژوهشی، و نداشتن دانش کافی معلمان برای درک محتوای پژوهشهای دانشگاهی از مهمترین دلایل عدم کاربست پژوهش در نظام آموزش زبان به شمار میرود.

Keywords [Persian]

کاربست پژوهش های دانشگاهی
دیدگاه معلمان
عملکرد آموزشی

References

Akbari, R. (2007). Reflections on reflection: A critical appraisal of reflective practices in L2 teacher education. System, 35(2), 192-207. doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.12.008

Akbari, R., Behzadpoor, F. & Dadvand, B. (2010). Development of English language teaching reflection inventory. System, 38(2), 211-227. doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.03.003

Allison, D., & Carey, J. (2007). What do university language teachers say about language teaching research? TESL Canada Journal , 24 (2), 61-81. doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v24i2.139

Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case of exploratory practice. The Modern Language Journal , 89 (3), 353-366. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00310.x

Babbie, E. (1990). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Bauer, K. & Fischer, F. (2007). The educational research-practice interface revisited: Ascripting perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13, 221-236. doi.org/10.1080/13803610701626150

Biesta, G. (2007). Bridging the gap between educational research and educational practice: The need for critical distance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13 (3), 295-301. doi.org/10.1080/13803610701640227

Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003). Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32 (9), 3-14. doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032009003

Borg, S. (2007). Research engagement in English language teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 731-747. doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.03.012

Borg, S. (2009). English language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30 (3), 358-388. doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp007

Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2012). University teacher educators’ research engagement: Perspectives from Saudi Arabia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 347-356. doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.011

Borg, S., & Liu, Y. (2013). Chinese college English teachers’ research engagement. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 270-299. doi.org/10.1002/tesq.56

Brace, I. (2004). Questionnaire design: How to plan, structure and write survey material for effective market research. Kogan Page.

Clarke, M. (1994). The dysfunctions of the theory/practice discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 28 (1), 9-26. doi.org/10.2307/3587196

Dornyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Everton, T., Galton, M. & Pell, T. (2002). Educational research and the teacher. Research Papers in Education, 17 (4), 373-401. doi.org/10.1080/0267152022000031388

Faribi, M., Derakhshan, A. & Robati, M. (2019). Iranian English language teachers’ conceptions towards research. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 2 (2): 1-11. doi. org/ 10.29252/ijes.2.2.1

Funk, S. G., Tornquist, E. M., & Champagne, M. T. (1989). Application and evaluation of the dissemination model. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 11, 486-491. doi.org/10.1177/019394598901100411

Gao, X., Barkhuizen, G., & Chow, A. (2010). 'Nowadays, teachers are relatively obedient': Understanding primary school English teachers’ conceptions of and drives for research in China. Language Teaching Research , 15 (1), 61-81. doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383344

Gore, J. M., & Gitlin, A. D. (2004). [RE]Visioning the academic-teacher divide: Power and knowledge in the educational community. Teachers and Teaching , 10 (1), 35-58. doi.org/10.1080/13540600320000170918

Hargreaves, D. (1980). The occupation culture of teachers. In P. Woods (Ed.), Teacher strategies: Explorations in the sociology of the school. (pp. 125-149). Croom Helm Publishers).

Hemsley-Brown, J. & Sharp, C. (2003). The use of research to improve professional practice: A systematic review of the literature. Oxford Review of Education 29, 449-470. doi.org/10.1080/0305498032000153025

Macaro, E. (2003). Teaching and learning a second language: A guide to recent research and its applications. Continuum.

McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for English language teachers. Hodder Arnold.

Mehrani, M. B. (2014). Bridging the gap between research and practice: Voice of mediators. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 21-39.

Mehrani, M. B. (2015). English teachers’ research engagement: Level ofengagement and motivation. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 83-97.

Mehrani, M. B. (2016). Iranian EFL teachers’ conceptions of research: An explanatory mixed methods approach. Research in Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 95-117. doi.org/ 10.22055/rals.2016.11779

Mehrani, M. & Khodi, A. (2014). An appraisal of the Iranian academic research on English language teaching. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6 (3) 89-97.

Mehrani, M. & Behzadnia, A. (2013). English teachers' research engagement: Current barriers and future strategies. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research. 2 (4), 17- 32.

Nassaji, H. (2012). The relationship between SLA research and language pedagogy: Teachers’ perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 13(2), 337-365. doi.org/10.1177/1362168812436903

Ortega, L. (2005). For what and whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 428-443. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00315.x

Pica, T. (2005). Second language acquisition research and applied linguistics. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 263–80). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Pieters, J. & de Vries, B. (2007). Preface to the special issue. Educational Research and Evaluation , 13 (3), 199-202. doi.org/10.1080/13803610701626093

Rahimi, A. & Askari Bigdeli, R. (2016). Challenges of action research: Insights from language institutes. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 7 (2), 3-15.

Saeb, F., S. A., Nejadansari, D., & Moinzadeh, A. (2021). The impact of action research on teacher professional development: Perspectives from Iranian EFL teachers. Teaching English Language, 15(2), 265-297. doi.org/ 10.22132/TEL.2021.143114

Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.

Shafiee, Z. & Sotoudehnama, E. (2019). Contextual and educational dimensions of EFL teacher engagement in second language acquisition research. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44 (9), 1-24. doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2019v44.n9.1

Stewart, T. (2006). Teacher-researcher collaboration or teachers’ research? TESOL Quarterly, 40, 421-430. doi.org/10.2307/40264529

Usita, M. (2022). Research engagement: A participatory approach of learning for public school teachers . International Journal of Educational Research & Amp; Social Sciences, 3(1), 342–350. doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i1.279

Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances

A Survey of EFL Teachers’ Research Engagement

References

References

Volume 10, Issue 1 - Serial Number 19
April 2022
Pages 79-98

A Survey of EFL Teachers’ Research Engagement

References

References

Volume 10, Issue 1 - Serial Number 19April 2022Pages 79-98

Volume 10, Issue 1 - Serial Number 19
April 2022
Pages 79-98