Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Applied linguistics, English Department, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, University of Allameh Tabataba’i, Tehran, Iran

2 PhD Candidate in TEFL, Allameh Tabataba’i University (ATU), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In the present climate, Critical Literacy has become an area gathering momentum more than ever before, tantamount to an ‘invisible gem’ as almost many education systems have attempted, but failed, to incorporate it into their curricula. To address this elusive notion, this study aimed to investigate the obstacles in the way of possible dilemmas, challenges, constraints, and limitations Iranian EFL teachers face in the process of implementing critical literacy in their online classes. This qualitative research study was conducted in two phases. First, an open-ended set of questions was developed after reviewing the literature, scrutinizing the existing questionnaires, and collecting data from experts in the field. To do so, after reviewing the literature, a list of questions was composed. Subsequently, qualitative data were collected (and analyzed) from 29 EFL teachers through an open-ended questionnaire and interview. The framework and elicited data led to the development of 23 items for the interview part. Accordingly, the online classes of all the teachers were observed by the researchers for an entire term. From what has been discussed, the following conclusion may be drawn that critical literacy needs to be part of the language teaching curricula in Iran. The finding can potentially aid the key educational stakeholders, including second/foreign language (L2) policymakers, teacher educators, authorities in charge of recruiting teachers, and materials developers, to take appropriate measures to increase pre- and in-service L2 teachers’ critical literacy and, as a result, encourage the implementation of this key concept in the instructional contexts.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Article Title [Persian]

رونمایی از گوهر نامرئی: شناسایی موانع بر سر راه اجرای فرآیند سواد انتقادی در کلاس‌های آنلاین درایران

Authors [Persian]

  • دکتر اسمعیل علی سلیمی 1
  • امید استاد 2

1 دانشیار زبانشناسی کاربردی، گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشکده ادبیات فارسی و زبان های خارجی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

Abstract [Persian]

در اوضاع و شرایط کنونی، سواد انتقادی تبدیل به حوزه‌ای شده است که بیش از هر زمان دیگری شتاب گرفته و در حکم « گوهر نامرئی» است، چرا که تقریباً بسیاری از سیستم‌های آموزشی کوشیده اند آن را در برنامه‌های درسی خود جای دهند. به منظور بررسی این مفهوم،این پژوهش بر آن است تا معضلات احتمالی، چالش‌ها، محدودیت‌ها، به ویژه محدودیت‌هایی را که معلمان زبان انگلیسی ایرانی در فرآیند اجرای سواد انتقادی در کلاس‌های آنلاین خود با آن مواجه هستند بررسی کند.این پژوهش کیفی در دو مرحله انجام شد. در مرحله نخست، پس از بررسی ادبیات تحقیق و سنجش دقیق پرسشنامه‌های موجود و جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از متخصصان این حوزه، مجموعه‌ای از پرسش‌های باز، تهیه و فهرست شد. سپس، داده های کیفی جمع آوری شده از ۲۹ معلم زبان انگلیسی از طریق پرسشنامه باز و مصاحبه، مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. چارچوب و داده های استخراج شده، به توسعه ۲۳ پرسش برای بخش مصاحبه رهنمون شد. بر این اساس، کلاس های آنلاین کلیه معلمان برای یک ترم کامل از سوی نگارنده مشاهده شد. با در نظر گرفتن یافته ها و دیگر موارد مطرح شده، می توان چنین نتیجه گرفت که بخشی از برنامه های درسی آموزش زبان در ایران باید به سواد انتقادی اختصاص یابد. این یافته‌ها به طور بالقوه به متولیان امر آموزش، از جمله سیاست‌گذاران زبان دوم/خارجی، مربی معلمان، مقامات مسئول جذب معلمان، و توسعه‌دهندگان مواد آموزشی کمک می‌کند تا اقدامات مناسبی برای افزایش سواد انتقادی معلمان زبان دوم/خارجی قبل و حین خدمت انجام دهند که در نتیجه، ترغیب اجرای این مفهوم کلیدی را در زمینه آموزشی به دنبال دارد.

Keywords [Persian]

  • سواد انتقادی
  • موانع
  • کلاس های آنلاین زبان انگلیسی
  • دانشجویان ایرانی
Abdelrahim, A. T. (2007). The relationship between gender and experience in teacher’s awareness of critical pedagogy [Master’s thesis, Tarbiat Modarres University]. Tarbiat Modarres University.
Abednia, A., & Izadinia, M. (2013). Critical pedagogy in ELT classroom: Exploring contributions of critical literacy to learners’ critical consciousness. Language Awareness, 22(4), 338-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2012.733400
Aliakbari, M., & Faraji, E. (2011). Basic principles of critical pedagogy [Paper Presentation]. Second International Conference on Humanities, Historical and Social Sciences IPEDR. Singapore, IACSIT Press.
Anderson, G. L., & Irvine, P. (1993). Informing critical literacy with ethnography. In C. Lankshear & P. McLaren (Eds.), Critical literacy: Politics, praxis, and the postmodern (pp. 81-104). State University of   New York Press.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Wadsworth.
Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Sage Publications.
Bender-Slack, D. (2010). Texts, talk ... and fear? English language arts teachers negotiate social justice teaching. English Education, 42(2), 181-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40607961 
Cadeiro-Kaplan, K., & Smith, K. (2002). Literacy ideologies: Critically engaging the Language Arts curriculum. Language Arts, 79(5), 372-381.
Cho, H. & Johnson, P. (2020) “We have to focus on improving our and our next generation’s rights!” Exploring critical literacy in a third space for Korean female high school students. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 5427587.2020.1805612
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Curdt-Christiansen, X. L. (2010). Competing priorities: Singaporean teachers' perspectives on critical literacy. International Journal of Educational Research, 49(6), 184-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.04.001
DeMulder, E. K., Stribling, S. M., & Day, M. (2013). Examining the immigrant experience: Helping teachers develop as critical educators. Teaching Education, 25(1), 43-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2012.743984
Faulkner, V. (2011). Adolescent literacies within the middle years of schooling: A case study of a year 8 classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(2), 108- 117. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.49.2.3
Freebody, P., & Luke, A. (1990). Literacies programs: Debates and demands in cultural context. Prospect: Australian Journal of TESOL, 5(7), 7-16.               
Freire, Paulo (1968). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
Ghaffar Samar, R., & Hossein-Davari, I. (2011). Liberalist or alarmist: Iranian ELT community's attitude to mainstream ELT vs. critical ELT. TESOL Journal, 63(5), 63-91.
Hao, R. N. (2011). Rethinking critical pedagogy: Implications on silence and silent bodies. Text and Performance Quarterly, 31(3), 267-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462937.2011.573185 
Jeyaraj, J. J., & Harland, T. (2014). Transforming teaching and learning in ELT through critical pedagogy: An international study. Journal of Transformative Education, 12(4), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344614550042 
King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Knobel, M. (1998). Critical literacies in teacher education. In Knobel, M. & Healy, A. (Eds.), Critical Literacies in the Primary Classroom (89-111). Primary English Teaching Association.
Ko, M. Y. (2013). A case study of an EFL teacher's critical literacy teaching in a reading class in Taiwan. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812457537 
Ko, M. Y., & Wang, T. F. (2013). EFL learners’ critical literacy practices: A case study of four college students in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(3), 221-229. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S40299-012-0013-5 
Ko, M. Y. B. (2010). Critical literacy development in a college-level Englishreading class in Taiwan [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University]. Indiana University Press.
Ko, M. Y., & Wang, T. (2009). Introducing critical literacy to EFL teaching: Three Taiwanese college teachers' conceptualization. Asian EFL Journal, 11(1), 174-191.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Dangerous liaison: Globalization, empire, and TESOL. In J. Edge (Ed.), (Re)locating TESOL in an age of empire (pp. 1-26). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-0-230-50223-9_1 
Kuo, J.M. (2009). Critical literacy and a picture-book-based dialogue activity in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(4), 483–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9048-6 
Kubota, R. (2014). We must look at both sides--but a denial of genocide, too? Difficult moments on controversial issues in the classroom. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 11(4), 225-251.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2014.968071 
Lankshear, C., & McLaren, P. (1993). Critical literacy: Politics, praxis, and the postmodern. State University of New York Press.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research methodology and design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Masuda, A. (2012). Critical literacy and teacher identities: A discursive site of struggle. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 9(3), 220-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2012.627026 
Mehranirad, M., & Behzadppoor, F. (2022). A survey of EFL teachers’ research engagement. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 10(1), 79-98.  https://dx.doi.org/10.22049/jalda.2022.27469.1365
Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. Guilford Press.
Pack, A. (2023), Discovery Critical Literacy, Reconstructing Identity. Journal for Multicultural Education, 17(1), 94-105. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-06-2021-0078
Park, Y. (2011). Using news articles to build a critical literacy classroom in an EFL setting. TESOL Journal, 2(1), 24-51. https://doi.org/10.5054/tj.2011.244134
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
Rahimi, A. & Askari Bigdeli, R. (2015). Why does critical literacy hit a snag in the Iranian EFL setting? Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 17(1), 53-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2015.1.a04 
Sangster, P., Stone, K., & Anderson, C. (2013). Transformative professional learning: Embedding critical literacies in the classroom. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 615- 637. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.751617
Schultz, K. (2002). Looking across space and time: Reconceptualizing literacy learning in and out of school. Research in the Teaching of English, 36(3), 356-390.
Shor, I. (1999). What is critical literacy? Journal of Pedagogy, Pluralism, and Practice, 1(4), 1-32.
Talmy, S. (2010). Qualitative Interviews in Applied Linguistics: From Research Instrument to Social Practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 128-148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190510000085 
Tan, L., Bopry, J., & Libo, G. (2010). Portraits of new literacies in two Singapore classrooms. RELC Journal, 41(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210343864 
Tan, L., & Guo, L. (2009). From print to critical multimedia literacy: One teacher’s foray into new literacies practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(4), 315-324. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.53.4.5 
UNESCO Education Sector (2004). The plurality of literacy and its implications for policies and programmes. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000136246 
Wallace, C. (2003). Critical reading in language education. Palgrave Macmillan.
Weber, R. P. (1985). Basic Content analysis. Sage.
Weng, T. (2023). Creating Critical Literacy Praxis: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice. RELC Journal54(1), 197 207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220982665
White, J. W. (2009). Reading "the word and the world": The double-edged sword of teaching critical literacy. Voices from the Middle, 17(2), 55-57.
Williamson, I., Leeming, D., Lyttle, S., & Johnson, S. (2015). Evaluating the audio-diary method in qualitative research. Qualitative Research Journal, 15(1), 20-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-04-2014-0014 
Yilmaz, K. (2009). Elementary school teachers’ views about the critical pedagogy. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(1), 139-149. https://dx.doi.org/10.3860/taper.v18i1.1042
Zaini, A. (2022). Ambivalent reading: Ambivalence as a reading practice in critical literacy. Language Teaching Research, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216882211 26724