Document Type : Research Articles


1 Associate Professor of Applied Linguistics, English Department, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, University of Neyshabur, Neyshabur, Iran,

2 Assistant Professor of Applied Linguistics, English Department, Faculty of Literature & Humanities, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran


The field of language teaching has recently witnessed a resurgent wave of interest in the value of educational research and its impact on teachers’ practice. Consequently, various strands of inquiry have commenced to investigate the relationship between research and practice. Within these discussions, however, the opinions of teachers are mostly ignored or reflected only circumstantially. The purpose of this study was to take teachers’ views about research on board by exploring the extent to which they use and conduct research as well as the barriers that may hinder their research engagement. To collect data, a survey questionnaire was designed and validated through soliciting experts’ opinions and conducting factor analysis. The questionnaire was then administered among a large sample of Iranian English teachers. Participants’ responses showed moderate levels of research engagement among English teachers. Results also indicated that four categories of barriers can best account for teachers’ lack of research engagement: problems related to the nature and quality of research, restrictive educational policies, lack of systematic partnership, and problems associated with the use of research in educational settings. The findings suggest that the research-practice division is the result of a complex interaction of an array of factors that cannot be simply reduced to technical matters. Thus, reconfiguration of the gap requires multidimensional strands of development in research and practice communities as well as in educational policies.


Main Subjects

Article Title [فارسی]

بررسی ارتباط معلمان زبان انگلیسی با پژوهش

Authors [فارسی]

  • دکتر مهدی مهرانی راد 1
  • دکتر فؤاد بهزادپور 2

1 دانشیار زبانشناسی کاربردی، گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه نیشابور، نیشابور، ایران

2 استادیار زبانشناسی کاربردی، گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان، تبریز، ایران

Abstract [فارسی]

ارزش پژوهش و قابلیت تاثیرگذاری آن بر فعالیت­های آموزشی معلمان در سال­های اخیر مورد توجه بسیاری از پژوهشگران در رشته آموزش زبان بوده است. در این رابطه،  تحقیقات مختلفی با هدف بهبود ارتباط بین پژوهش و عملکرد آموزشی صورت گرفته است. لیکن بررسی­ها نشان می­دهد که در این پژوهش­ها دیدگاه معلمان به عنوان مهم­ترین کنشگران آموزشی چندان مورد توجه نبوده است.  پژوهش پیش رو با هدف بررسی دیدگاه معلمان نسبت به بکارگیری یافته­های پژوهشی در آموزش زبان انجام شده است. بدین منظور، نخست پرسشنامه­ای برای تعیین میزان ارتباط معلمان با پژوهش و نیز بررسی موانع موجود در این راه تهیه شد. پس از مشخص شدن روایی و پایایی، به منظور گردآوری داده­ها، پرسشنامه در بین بیش از پانصد معلم زبان انگلیسی توزیع شد. تحلیل پاسخ­های معلمان نشان داد که ارتباط ایشان با پژوهش­های دانشگاهی به میزان متوسط هست، اما معلمانی که دارای مدارک دانشگاهی بالاتر و تجربه آموزشی کمتری هستند، تمایل بیشتری به انجام فعالیت­های پژوهشی دارند. علاوه براین یافته­های این پژوهش موید اینست که موانع بکارگیری پژوهش در آموزش زبان را می­توان به چهار گروه تقسیم کرد: موانع مرتبط با ماهیت و کیفیت پژوهش­ها، موانع مرتبط با سیاست­های آموزشی، موانع مربوط به عدم ارتباط سازنده بین محققان و معلمان، و موانع مرتبط با اجرایی شدن یافته­های پژوهشی در کلاس­های آموزش زبان. تحلیل آماری وزنی هر یک از موانع نیز نشان داد که عدم حمایت­های فکری و مالی، نبود سامانه جامع پژوهشی، و نداشتن دانش کافی معلمان برای درک محتوای پژوهش­های دانشگاهی از مهمترین دلایل عدم کاربست پژوهش در نظام آموزش زبان به شمار می­رود.

Keywords [فارسی]

  • کاربست پژوهش های دانشگاهی
  • دیدگاه معلمان
  • عملکرد آموزشی
Akbari, R. (2007). Reflections on reflection: A critical appraisal of reflective practices in L2 teacher education. System, 35(2), 192-207.
Akbari, R., Behzadpoor, F. & Dadvand, B. (2010). Development of English language teaching reflection inventory. System, 38(2), 211-227.
Allison, D., & Carey, J. (2007). What do university language teachers say about language teaching research? TESL Canada Journal , 24 (2), 61-81.
Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case of exploratory practice. The Modern Language Journal , 89 (3), 353-366.
Babbie, E. (1990). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Bauer, K. & Fischer, F. (2007). The educational research-practice interface revisited: Ascripting perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13, 221-236.
Biesta, G. (2007). Bridging the gap between educational research and educational practice: The need for critical distance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13 (3), 295-301.
Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003). Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32 (9), 3-14.
Borg, S. (2007). Research engagement in English language teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 731-747.
Borg, S. (2009). English language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30 (3), 358-388.
Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2012). University teacher educators’ research engagement: Perspectives from Saudi Arabia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 347-356.
Borg, S., & Liu, Y. (2013). Chinese college English teachers’ research engagement. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 270-299.
Brace, I. (2004). Questionnaire design: How to plan, structure and write survey material for effective market research. Kogan Page.
Clarke, M. (1994). The dysfunctions of the theory/practice discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 28 (1), 9-26.
Dornyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Everton, T., Galton, M. & Pell, T. (2002). Educational research and the teacher. Research Papers in Education, 17 (4), 373-401.
Faribi, M., Derakhshan, A. & Robati, M. (2019). Iranian English language teachers’ conceptions towards research. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 2 (2): 1-11. doi. org/ 10.29252/ijes.2.2.1
Funk, S. G., Tornquist, E. M., & Champagne, M. T. (1989). Application and evaluation of the dissemination model. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 11, 486-491.
Gao, X., Barkhuizen, G., & Chow, A. (2010). 'Nowadays, teachers are relatively obedient': Understanding primary school English teachers’ conceptions of and drives for research in China. Language Teaching Research , 15 (1), 61-81.
Gore, J. M., & Gitlin, A. D. (2004). [RE]Visioning the academic-teacher divide: Power and knowledge in the educational community. Teachers and Teaching , 10 (1), 35-58.
Hargreaves, D. (1980). The occupation culture of teachers. In P. Woods (Ed.), Teacher strategies: Explorations in the sociology of the school. (pp. 125-149). Croom Helm Publishers).
Hemsley-Brown, J. & Sharp, C. (2003). The use of research to improve professional practice: A systematic review of the literature. Oxford Review of Education 29, 449-470.
Macaro, E. (2003). Teaching and learning a second language: A guide to recent research and its applications. Continuum.
McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for English language teachers. Hodder Arnold.
Mehrani, M. B. (2014). Bridging the gap between research and practice: Voice of mediators. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 21-39.
Mehrani, M. B. (2015). English teachers’ research engagement: Level ofengagement and motivation. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 83-97.
Mehrani, M. B. (2016). Iranian EFL teachers’ conceptions of research: An explanatory mixed methods approach. Research in Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 95-117. 10.22055/rals.2016.11779
Mehrani, M. & Khodi, A. (2014). An appraisal of the Iranian academic research on English language teaching. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6 (3) 89-97.
Mehrani, M. & Behzadnia, A. (2013). English teachers' research engagement: Current barriers and future strategies. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research. 2 (4), 17- 32.
Nassaji, H. (2012). The relationship between SLA research and language pedagogy: Teachers’ perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 13(2), 337-365.
Ortega, L. (2005). For what and whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 428-443.
Pica, T. (2005). Second language acquisition research and applied linguistics. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 263–80). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Pieters, J. & de Vries, B. (2007). Preface to the special issue. Educational Research and Evaluation , 13 (3), 199-202.
Rahimi, A. & Askari Bigdeli, R. (2016). Challenges of action research: Insights from language institutes. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 7 (2), 3-15.
Saeb, F., S. A., Nejadansari, D., & Moinzadeh, A. (2021). The impact of action research on teacher professional development: Perspectives from Iranian EFL teachers. Teaching English Language, 15(2), 265-297. 10.22132/TEL.2021.143114
Schön, D. A. (1987).  Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions.  Jossey-Bass.
Shafiee, Z. & Sotoudehnama, E. (2019). Contextual and educational dimensions of EFL teacher engagement in second language acquisition research. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44 (9), 1-24.
Stewart, T. (2006). Teacher-researcher collaboration or teachers’ research? TESOL Quarterly, 40, 421-430.
Usita, M. (2022). Research engagement: A participatory approach of learning for public school teachers . International Journal of Educational Research & Amp; Social Sciences, 3(1), 342–350.