Document Type : Research Articles


1 Ph.D. Candidate in English Language and Literature, Kish International Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran,

2 Professor of English Literature, Department of Foreign Languages and Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran


It has been quite a while since research in different disciplines has become widely cross-fertilized. The cultural matrix of our era has made it possible for ideas and metaphors to move across disciplines. John Barth has been one of the most-celebrated cross-disciplinary fiction writers, who has been perceptive of and receptive to breakthroughs in other disciplines to reinvigorate fiction. Despite the fact that Barth’s literary career, particularly from Lost in the Funhouse (Funhouse), coincides with the coronation of Quantum Mechanics as the regime capable of addressing reality in a more precise way, the recognition of the influence of Quantum Mechanics on Funhouse has been conspicuously absent from the critical enterprise, and the bulk of research has viewed it in the light of Poststructuralism, whose application to contemporary fiction has been exhaustible by now. Establishing the framework of the Article based on some concepts for which the Copenhagen Interpretation and the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics are famous, the present study offers a new perspective to approach the idiosyncrasies of Ambrose in the series, thereby employing an unprecedented methodology to replenish a work which has been subjected to a barrage of metafictional readings. 


Main Subjects

Article Title [فارسی]

آمبروز گمشده در شهربازی: تلاقی مکانیک کوانتومی، دازاین و باروک

Authors [فارسی]

  • علی امامی پور 1
  • دکتر فریده پورگیو 2

1 دانشجوی دکتری زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، پردیس بین المللی کیش، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 استاد زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، گروه زبانشناسی و زبانهای خارجی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

Abstract [فارسی]

با افزایش تبادلات بین رشته­ای امکان رد و بدل شدن ایده­ها و مفاهیم بین رشته­های علوم انسانی و علوم طبیعی مهیا شده است. همواره از جان بارت بعنوان یکی از معروفترین نویسندگان که هم در آثار ادبی و مقالات غیر ادبی خود از مفاهیم بروز سایر رشته­ها وام گرفته است و در نتیجه باعث جانی دوباره دادن بر پیکر ادبیات شده است یاد می­شود. علیرغم اینکه نگارش رمان «گمشده در شهربازی» اثر جان بارت و فراگیر شدن اصول فیزیک کوانتومی در محافل علمی و اجتماعی در بازه زمانی یکسانی بوقوع پیوستند، تاثیر مفاهیم فیزیک مدرن که تصویری دقیق تر درباره حقیقت نمایان می­سازد در این اثر مورد غفلت قرار گرفته و اکثر پژوهشگران مصرند تا این اثر را در چارچوب پساساختارگرایی، که مدت­هاست فرسوده شده است، مطالعه کنند. این مطالعه برآنست تا با استفاده از مفاهیمی که اساس تفسیر کپنهاگی و تفسیر دنیاهای موازی مکانیک کوانتومی بر آن­ها بنا شده است، چشم اندازی جدید را در داستان­های حول شخصیت آمبروز ارائه داده و این اثر جذاب را از آماج تفاسیر کسل کننده فراداستانی حفظ کند.

Keywords [فارسی]

  • باروک
  • پدیدارشناسی
  • مکانیک کوانتومی
  • اصل عدم قطعیت
  • دوگانگی موج و ذره
Barth, J. S. (1981). Lost in the funhouse: Fiction for print, tape, live voice. Bantam Books.
Baulch, D. M. (2003). Time, narrative, and the multiverse: Post-Newtonian narrative in Borges's the garden of the forking paths and Blake's Vala or the four zoas. The Comparatist, 27, 56-78.
Bell, J. S. (1992). Six possible worlds of quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 22(10), 1201-1215.
Booker, M. K. (1990). Joyce, Planck, Einstein, and Heisenberg: A relativistic quantum mechanical discussion of Ulysses. James Joyce Quarterly, 27(3), 577–586.
Coale, S. C. (2011). Quantum flux and narrative flow: Don DeLillo’s entanglements with quantum theory. Papers on Language and Literature, 74(3), 261-294.
Coulthard, A. R. (1994). Barth's lost in the funhouse. The Explicator, 52(3), 180.
Davis, R. C. (1985). The case for a post-structuralist mimesis: John Barth and imitation. The American Journal of Semiotics, 3(3), 49-72.
de Broglie, L. (1924). Recherches sur la théorie des quanta. Annales de Physique, 10(3), 22-128.
Dillard, A. (1983). Living by fiction. Harper Colophon.
Doležel, L. (1998). Heterocosmica: Fiction and possible worlds. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Edwards, B. (1985). Deconstructing the artist and the art: Barth and Calvino at play in the funhouse of language. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature, 12(2), 264–86.
Fletcher, J. (2019). Myths of the underworld in contemporary culture: The backward gaze. Oxford University Press.
Front, S. (2015). Shapes of time in British twenty-first century quantum fiction. Cambridge Scholars.
Greene, B. (1999). The elegant universe: Superstrings, hidden dimensions, and the quest for the ultimate theory. Random House.
Greene, B. (2004). The fabric of the cosmos: Space, time, and the texture of reality. Alfred A. Knopf.
Hauser, A. (1962). The social history of art: Renaissance, mannerism and baroque. Routledge.
Hinden, M. (1973). Lost in the funhouse: Barth’s use of the recent past. Twentieth Century Literature, 19(2), 107–118.
Johnson, C. D. (2020). On Borges’s B/baroque. Comparative Literature,72(4), 377-405.
Katsumori, M. (2011). Niels Bohr's complementarity: Its structure, history, and intersections with hermeneutics and deconstruction. Springer.
Kinch, S. S. (2011). Quantum mechanics and modern fiction (Order No. 3037511). [Doctoral dissertation, the University of Texas at Austin, Ann Arbor]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Lawrence, D. H. (1995). The spirit of place: Studies in classic American literature. Atlantic Publishers and Distributers.
Martin, W. T. (1997). Self-knowledge and self-conception: The therapy of autobiography in John Barth's Lost in the funhouse. Studies in Short Fiction, 34(2), 151-157.
Merrell, F. (2006). Jorge Luis Borges and early quantum labyrinths. In J. Hoeg, & K. S. Larsen (Eds.), Science, literature, and film in the Hispanic world (pp. 49-73). Palgrave Macmillan.
Morrell, D. (1976). John Barth: An introduction. The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Nas, L. (1999). “Scheherazade,c’est moi”: Narrativist mimesis and the principle of metaphoric means in John Barth. Journal of Literary Studies, 15(1-2), 132–145.
Plotnitsky, A. (2017). Philosophical skepticism and narrative incredulity: Postmodern theory and postmodern American fiction. In P. Geyh (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to postmodern American fiction (pp. 63-80). Cambridge University Press.
Reilly, C. (2000). An interview with John Barth. Contemporary Literature, 41(4), 589–617.
Ryan, M. L. (2006). From parallel universes to possible worlds: Ontological pluralism in physics, narratology, and narrative. Poetics Today, 27(4), 633-674.
Shankar, R. (2016). Quantum mechanics: The main experiment. Fundamentals of physics II: Electromagnetism, optics, and quantum mechanics. Yale University Press.
Slaughter, C. N. (1989). Who gets lost in the funhouse. Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory, 44(4), 80-97. doi:10.1353/arq.1989.0017