Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of English Language Teaching, Department of English Language, Faculty of Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

2 MA in English Language Teaching, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

Abstract

In the last two decades, citation behaviour in academic research writing has been highlighted in English for academic purposes. This concordance-informed, corpus-based study has focused on cross-disciplinary analysis of citations by English and Iranian academic writers in English Economics and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering research articles  published in international and Iranian national English-medium journals. To that end, research articles in Economics and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering were developed and divided into four sub-corpora: English corpus and Iranian corpus. Thompson and Tribble’s (2001) classification and Thompson and Ye’s (1991) framework were used to analyse citations. The computer program AntConc (version 3.5.7) was used to identify 1,032 citations. The results of data analysis showed more frequent uses of citations by Economics than Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering writers. In terms of citation structures, more integral citations were utilised by Economics writers, and more non-integral citations were used by Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering writers. In addition, the citation analyses of native and non-native writers revealed that English writers employed more citations than Iranian writers. The findings imply that the cultural context of publication, in addition to the linguistic background and knowledge structures of their disciplines, seems to shape the writers’ citation choices when writing their research articles.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Article Title [Persian]

تحلیل بین فرهنگی پیکره محور از ارجاعات متنی در دو گروه نویسنده در دو محل انتشار: تفاوت های رشته ای

Authors [Persian]

  • دکتر رجب اسفندیاری 1
  • سحر صالح 2

1 دانشیار آموزش زبان انگلیسی، گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی (ره)، قزوین، ایران

2 کارشناس ارشد آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی، قزوین، ایران

Abstract [Persian]

در دو دهه گذشته، ارجاعات درون متنی در انگلیسی با اهداف ویژه از اهمیت ویژه ای برخوردار شده است. هدف از تحقیق حاضر بررسی ارجاعات درون متنی در مقالات تحقیقی چاپ شده نویسندگان انگلیسی زبان و فارس زبان در مجلات معتبر انگلیسی زبان ایرانی و بین المللی در دو رشته اقتصاد و مهندسی صنایع بوده است. به همین منظور، چهار پیکره از مقالات تحقیقی در این دو رشته ساخته شد و از طبقه بندی تامسون و تریبل (2001) و چارچوب یی (1990) برای تحلیل ارجاعات درون متنی استفاده شد. از نرم افزار انتکانک برای تحلیل 1032 ارجاع متنی استفاده شد. نتایج تحلیل داده­ها نشان می­دهد که نویسندگان در رشته اقتصاد استفاده بیشتری از ارجاعات می­کنند. نویسندگان در رشته اقتصاد بیشتر از نویسندگان رشته مهندسی صنایع از  ارجاعات انتگرال استفاده می کنند. نتایج تحلیل داده­ها همچنین نشان می­دهد که انگلیسی زبان­ها بیشتر از نویسندگان ایرانی از ارجاعات استفاده می­کنند. نتایج مطالعه حاکی از آن است که علاوه بر پیشینه زبانی و ساختار رشته­ها، محل انتشار مقالات نیز می­تواند تاثیر شگرفی بر نحوه اجاع­دهی متنی در مقالات داشته باشد.       

Keywords [Persian]

  • ارجاعات درون متنی
  • مقاله تحقیقی
  • بخشی از مقاله
  • اقتصاد
  • مهندسی صنایع و مواد
References
Anthony, L. (2018). AntConc (Version 3.5.7) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
Arizavi, S., & Choubsaz Y. (2021). Citation practices in research article introductions: The interplay between disciplines and research methodologies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 383-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12337 
Charles, M. (2006). The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 492–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml021 
Coffin, C. (2009). Incorporating and evaluating voices in a film studies thesis. Writing & Pedagogy, 1(2), 163–193. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v1i2.163 
Dobakhti, L. & Zohrabi, M. (2018). Citation behaviors of applied linguists in discussion sections of research articles. Applied Research on English Language, 7(2), 183-203.
Donner, P. (2021). Citation analysis of Ph.D. theses with data from Scopus and Google Books. Scientometrics, 126, 9431–9456 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04173-w.
ElMalik, A. T., & Nesi, H. (2008). Publishing research in a second language: the case of Sudanese contributors to international medical journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.007 
Fazel, I., & Shi, L. (2015). Citation behaviors of graduate students in grant proposal writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20(4), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.10.002 
Fløttum, K., Dahl, T., & Kinn, T. (2006). Academic voices: Across languages and disciplines. John Benjamins.
Harwood, N. (2009). An interview-based study of the functions of citation in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(3), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.001 
Hewings, A., Lillis, T., & Vladimirious, D. (2010). Who’s citing whose writings? A corpus based study of citations as interpersonal resource in English medium national and English medium international journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.005 
Hu, G. (2023). Radical cures for author self-citation gaming. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101266 
Hu, G., & Wang, G. (2014). Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14(4), 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.001 
Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341 
Hyland, K. (2013). Writing in the university: education, knowledge and reputation. Language Teaching, 46(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000036 
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2018). Points of reference: Changing patterns of academic citation. Applied Linguistics, 40(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx012 
Jalilifar, A. (2012). Academic attribution: citation analysis in master’s theses and research articles in applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2011.00291.x 
Kwan, B. S. C., & Chan, H. (2014). An investigation of source use in the results and the closing sections of empirical articles in information systems: In search of a functional semantic citation typology for pedagogical purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14(4), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.004 
Lee, J. J., Hitchock, C., & Casal, J. E. (2018). Citation practices of L2 university students in first-year writing: Form, function, and stance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.01.001 
Lillis, T., Hewings, A., Vladimirious, D., & Curry, M. J. (2010). The geolinguistics of English as an academic lingua franca: citation practices across English-medium national and English-medium international journals. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 111-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00233.x 
Mansourizadeh, K., & Ahmad, U. K. (2011). Citation practices among non-native expert and novice scientific writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.004 
Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer.
Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. University of Wisconsin Press.
Pecorari, D. (2006). Visible and occluded citation features in postgraduate second language writing. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.004 
Petric, B. (2007). Rhetorical functions of citations in high- and low-rated master’s theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(3), 238–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.002 
Petric, B., & Harwood, N. (2013). Task requirements, task representation, and self-reported citation functions: An exploratory study of a successful L2 student’s writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(2), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.01.002 
Samraj, B. (2013). Form and function of citations in discussion sections of master’s theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(4), 299-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.09.001 
Swales, J. M. (2014). Variation in citational practice in a corpus of student biology papers: From parenthetical plonking to intertextual storytelling. Written Communication Journal, 31(1), 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313515166 
Thompson, G., & Tribble. C. (2001). Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language Learning and Technology, 5(3), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.4.365 
Thompson, G., & Ye, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 365–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.4.365 
Thompson, P. (2001). A pedagogically-motivated corpus-based examination of Ph.D. theses: Macrostructure, citation practices and uses of modal verbs. Retrieved from https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.393751
Thompson, P. (2005). Points of focus and position: intertextual reference in Ph.D. theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(4), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.006 
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
White, H. (2004) Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 89–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.1.89
Zhang, G. (2022). Authorial stance in citations: Variation by writer expertise and research article part-genres. English for Specific Purposes, 70, 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.12.002